-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
2 possible package resolutions #26
Comments
Actually, this should be solved in the latest release (v1.2.5): arosics-feedstock/recipe/meta.yaml Line 27 in e36db03
Could you try to force conda to install arosics 1.2.5 by running Unfortunaly, there was a broken folium release (0.12.0), which was already patched on PyPI (0.12.1) but the 0.12.1 release is still missing on conda-forge (see python-visualization/folium#1438). So the only way I see to work around this at the moment is to block folium 0.12.0 and to fall back to 0.11.0 in arosics. |
I can do that, but everytime I do:
I get the same message. I didn't know about the broken folium release. I hope they can fix it soon. Thanks! |
I think resolver suggests v0.9.24 because if I have installed folium 0.12.0, it is the latest arosics version compatible (it doesn't have an explicit folium!=0.12.0) I think everything will be solve with the new folium release. Please, close this issue if your are fine with that. |
The latest compatible version should be 1.2.3 because this does not block folium 0.12.0. Version 0.9.24 was simply the last noarch release but it is outdated now and should not suggested by the resolver anymore. However, I guess |
Note that this is legit and not an error. The warning is just letting you know that the solver found two possible solutions and is choosing one. If you want the other solution then you'll need to pin things to make it easier for the solver to find only that one. |
The thing is that the solver found two versions of my own package. The latest one (1.2.5) and a completely outdated one (0.9.24). The only reason for this behaviour that I can image is that 0.9.24 is the latest noarch version. Later releases are architecture specific. But I cannot pin my own package. I just want to avoid that the solver suggests such outdated versions. |
This seems to be fixed after updating some package metadata of the older conda-forge arosics releases here. Closing this for now. |
Since the last update, I have the following message:
I think this is solved in the pip version changing the requirement
folium>=0.6.0,!=0.12.0
byfolium>=0.6.0
, but not in the conda-forge version, am I right?Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: