You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Add "Irrelevant/off topic/waste of time" category for sections of a video that don't add anything to the video and just wastes your time
Let's say, for example, I look for a tutorial on how do something. Often YouTubers will add irrelevant stuff at parts of the video, usually at the start, where they waste your time with things like "Hey what's up guys, welcome back to another tutorial today we're gonna be..." etc etc where they introduce themselves and explain what they're gonna be doing (which I already know because I read it on the title) and a bunch of other pointless stuff I don't care about that just serves to pad out the video length or something.
It would be so much nicer to just search what I want, click on the video, and just be taken straight to what I searched for
Right now, the closest category to that is "intermission/intro animation" but that's not quite right for this.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Add "Irrelevant/off topic/waste of time" category for sections of a video that don't add anything to the video and just wastes your time
Let's say, for example, I look for a tutorial on how do something. Often YouTubers will add irrelevant stuff at parts of the video, usually at the start, where they waste your time with things like "Hey what's up guys, welcome back to another tutorial today we're gonna be..." etc etc where they introduce themselves and explain what they're gonna be doing (which I already know because I read it on the title) and a bunch of other pointless stuff I don't care about that just serves to pad out the video length or something.
It would be so much nicer to just search what I want, click on the video, and just be taken straight to what I searched for
Right now, the closest category to that is "intermission/intro animation" but that's not quite right for this.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: