-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Base.BinaryPlatforms.select_platform
broken on master
and 1.9
#49491
Labels
regression
Regression in behavior compared to a previous version
Milestone
Comments
Actually, it's Lines 346 to 352 in 8419b50
julia> platforms = Dict(
Platform("x86_64", "linux") => "bad",
Platform("x86_64", "linux"; sanitize="memory") => "good",
)
Dict{Platform, String} with 2 entries:
Linux x86_64 {libc=glibc, sanitize=memory} => "good"
Linux x86_64 {libc=glibc} => "bad"
julia> select_platform(platforms, Platform("x86_64", "linux"; sanitize="memory"))
"bad" |
Artifacts.artifact_meta
broken on master
Base.BinaryPlatforms.artifact_meta
broken on master
Base.BinaryPlatforms.artifact_meta
broken on master
Base.BinaryPlatforms.select_platform
broken on master
Base.BinaryPlatforms.select_platform
broken on master
Base.BinaryPlatforms.select_platform
broken on master
and 1.9
So do you want to revert #48749 for 1.9 then? |
I think that PR was meant to fix #42299 (comment), but that isn't merged yet, so reverting it should be safe for the time being. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Reproducer:
Expected output (and actual output on Julia v1.8):
Actual output:
Likely culprit: #48749. CC: @staticfloat
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: