You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Using a manually-expanded DSL means we can re-use built-in Lisp symbols like list and integer, which is more readable than having to name everything list-gen or integer-gen.
But this means we can't get SLIME to give usage hints in the mini-buffer the way we would if each generator type were constructed with an explicit function or macro.
I want to keep the DSL simple enough so that won't bother anybody learning how to use it. Please let me know if it's a problem.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Using a manually-expanded DSL means we can re-use built-in Lisp symbols like
list
andinteger
, which is more readable than having to name everythinglist-gen
orinteger-gen
.But this means we can't get SLIME to give usage hints in the mini-buffer the way we would if each generator type were constructed with an explicit function or macro.
I want to keep the DSL simple enough so that won't bother anybody learning how to use it. Please let me know if it's a problem.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: